Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Wilfred Kiptum Kimalat v Wycliffe Onyango & 3 others [2017] KEELC 2588 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI ELC. CASE NO. 824 OF 2016 WILFRED KIPTUM KIMALAT (SUING AS THE APPOINTED ATTORNEY OF JAMES KIPKOECH KIMALAT)….. PLAINTIFF VERSUS WYCLIFFE ONYANGO….…………………………............................................................................... ……….1ST DEFENDANT CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR…………………………............................................................................. …….…2ND DEFENDANT DISTRICT LAND REGISTRAR, NAIROBI …….…............................................................................. ………..3RD DEFENDANT HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL…………………................................................................................…. ……….4TH DEFENDANT RULING The Plaintiff seeks orders of injunction to restrain the 1 st Defendant, his agents or servants from trespassing, developing or dealing with the land known as Nairobi Umoja/ Block 107/1/1131(“the Suit Property”), until the suit is heard through the application dated 14 th July 2016. He also seeks orders to stay registration of any dealings on the Suit Property and an order to evict the 1 st Defendant pending hearing and determination of this suit. This being an interlocutory application, the court will consider prayers 4 and 5 of the application. The 6th prayer for eviction cannot be granted on a temporary basis since an eviction order is final. The application was served on the 2nd to 4th Defendants. The 1st Defendant could not be found for service although he is said to be constructing on the Suit Property. The Plaintiff sought and obtained orders to serve the 1st Defendant by substituted means. The 1st Defendant was served by an advertisement placed in the Daily Nation of 6th June 2017. The 1st Defendant did not enter appearance or file any papers in court. Mr. Terrell who appears for the 2nd to 4th Defendants did not oppose the application as the orders sought were against the 1st Defendant. The Plaintiff who swore the affidavit in support of the application claims to hold a power of attorney from James Kipkoech Kimalat, the registered owner of the Suit Property. The Plaintiff annexed a copy of the certificate of lease over the Suit Property dated 15th January 1998 together with copies of receipts issued to James Kipkoech Kimalat for the payment of rates. The Plaintiff claims that the 1 st Defendant has commenced construction on the Suit Property and is apprehensive that the Suit Property may be transferred before this suit is determined. The applicant wrote to the Cabinet Secretary for Lands on 23 rd July 2014 requesting for investigations into the allocation of the Suit Property to other parties. The County Government of Nairobi wrote to the Plaintiff on 18 th August 2014 and confirmed that from its records, the Suit Property is registered in the name of James Kipkoech. It is necessary to restrain dealings on the Suit Property until the suit is heard and determined. The court grants prayers 4 and 5 of the application. The orders will be enforced by the Officer Commanding Station,

page 1 of 2

Buru Buru. The Plaintiff will have the costs of the application. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 27th day of June 2017. K. BOR JUDGE In the presence of: Nyantika for the Plaintiffs No appearance for the Defendants Mr. V. Owuor- Court Assistant

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.