REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU E&L NO. 27 OF 2016 VINCENT MUGAMBI KAIGA.....................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS ESTHER NJOKI KIMATHI.....................................................DEFENDANT CONSENT/JUDGMENT 1. On 18.07.2016 the advocates representing the parties and the parties in this matter proffered the following Consent, which they asked the Court to adopt as it's Judgment. CONSENT 1. The Defendant shall refund to the plaintiff a sum of Kshs. 400,000/= on or before 31st August, 2016 being the purchase price already paid to her and the agreement for the sale of land dated 20th January, 2014 between the parties shall be rescinded henceforth. 2. All inhibitions registered against land parcel number ABOGETA/L-CHURE/1676 AND 1677 be lifted forthwith. 3. Parties to bear own costs. 2. I find that the Consent is properly signed and is binding upon the parties. 3. The Judgment is hereby entered in terms of the consent dated 18.07.16. The suit is marked as settled. 4. Parties shall bear their own costs. 5. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2017 IN THE PRESENCE OF:C.A: Janet Gatari for the Plaintiff Mutuma for the Defendant Plaintiff present HON. L. N. MBUGUA ELC JUDGE
Original judgment
Vincent Mugambi Kaiga v Esther Njoki Kimathi [2017] KEELC 2128 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.