REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU E.L.C. MISC. CASE NO. 3 OF 2017 PETER KARIUKI NJERU.......................................APPPLICANT VERSUS ERASTUS GILBERT KIMANI.......................1ST RESPONDENT MURIITHI FRANCIS KIMITA........................2ND RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant filed a notice of motion dated 3 rd April 2017 seeking transfer of Embu CMCC Award No. 47 of 2011 from the CM’s court to this court on the basis that the said court had no jurisdiction to entertain the matter. 2. The said application was supported by an affidavit sworn by the Applicant on 31 st March 2017 in which it was stated that the CM’s court had no jurisdiction to determine land cases. 3. There was no objection to the said application by counsel for the Respondent when the said application came up for hearing. 4. The court is aware that the question of whether or not the magistrates’ courts have jurisdiction is pending determination before the Court of Appeal and judgement is expected to be delivered on or about 13th October 2017. Ideally, this court should have waited for the decision of the Court of Appeal before determining this application. However, since the Applicant’s notice of motion was prosecuted on 29th June 2017, I shall make a ruling thereon even as we wait for the Court of Appeal Judgement. 5. There being no opposition to the said application, the court hereby allows the notice of motion dated 3rd April 2017 as prayed. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED in open court at EMBU this 26th day of SEPTEMBER, 2017 In the presence of Mr Omakalwala for the Applicant and Mr Okwaro holding brief for Ms Rose Njeru for Respondent. Court clerk Njue/Leadys Y.M. ANGIMA JUDGE 26.09.17
Original judgment
Peter Kariuki Njeru v Erastus Gilbert Kimani & another [2017] KEELC 1522 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.