REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA CHUKA ELC PETITION CASE NO 02 OF 2017 IN THE MATTER OF CONSTITUTION OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF VIOLATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE SAME UNDER ARTICLE 23 (1) & (3), 258 (1) CONSTITUTION OF KENYA AND RULE 19 OF SIXTH SCHEDULE OF THE TRANSITIONAL AND CONSEQUENTIAL PROVISIONS BETWEEN KINYUA M’IBUA M’MURAKU....................................................................................PETITIONER AND THARAKA NITHI COUNTY GOVERNMENT...................................................1ST RESPONDENT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, THARAKA NITHI.............................................2ND RESPONDENT DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION & SETTLEMENT OFFICER, THARAKA SOUTH/NORTH DISTRICTS..........................................................................3RD RESPONDENT THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL..................................................................4TH RESPONDENT THE MINISTER FOR LAND, HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT.........5 TH RESPONDENT RULING 1. This petition states as follows:
page 1 of 3
PETITION To the High Court of Kenya The Humble Petition of Kinyua M’Ibua M’Muraku of P. O. Box 2387-60200, Meru in the Republic of Kenya who petitions as follows:1. The Petitioner is an adult person of sound mind residing and earning living in Tharaka North County. Service for the purpose of this petition is C/O CHARLES KARIUKI & CO. ADVOCATES NJURI NCHEKE STREET, KCB BUUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, P. O. BOX 2387-60200, MERU. 2. The 1st Respondent is a Local Authority under Local Government Act services shall be through the Petitioners Advocate offices. 3. The 2nd and 3rd Respondents are departments of Government. Service is through the offices of the 4th Respondent who is the Government Chief Legal Adviser. 4. The 1st Respondent with the aid of 2nd and 3rd Respondents have taken 2.60 Ha of Petitioner’s parcel of land excised from his South Tharaka/Kamanyaki/”A”/354 and left him with the balance in Nos original No.354 and a new No. 481. 5. The matter went to the 3rd Respondent by way of objection No. 54 and 72 but he affirmed without justification that the 1st Respondent to get from land 1/3 of the petitioner’s whole land. 6. The matter went to the 2nd Respondent representing the Minister on delegated authority who affirmed the above verdict of the 3rd Respondent. 7. The 2 decisions are devoid of merit and unconstitutional as they deprived the Petitioner his 2.60 Ha without following the laid down procedure nor did they compensate him as required by the law. YOUR PETITIONER, therefore humbly prays that:(a) An order of judicial review to quash the decisions of the 2 nd and 3rd Respondents and land parcel No. S. THARAKA/KAMANYAKI/272 revert back to Petitioner. Alternatively Petitioner be fully and promptly compensated for the 2.60 Ha acquired by the 1 st Respondent. (b) Costs and interests DATED AT MERU THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012 FOR:CHARLES KARIUKI & CO. ADVOCATES FOR THE PETITIONER 2. On 21.11.2017, Mr. Murango Mwenda told the court that the Petitioner had ignored the court’s order to
page 2 of 3
file his written submissions within 14 days of 2.11.2017 to enable the respondents to respond. As the petitioner had not done so, he asked the court to dismiss the petition for disobedience of court orders and for non prosecution. 3. I agree that the petitioner has disobeyed this court’s order and has failed to prosecute his petition. 4. In the circumstances, this petition is dismissed. 5. Costs are awarded to the 1st Respondent. 6. It is so ordered. Delivered in open court at Chuka this 21st day of November, 2017 in the presence of: CA: Ndegwa Murango Mwenda for the 1st Respondent P.M. NJOROGE, JUDGE.
page 3 of 3