REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ELC CASE NO. 162 OF 2017 WILFRED MWIRIGI MUGAMBI..................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS SIRIAKA GANTUKU MARKO..................................................DEFENDANT RULING 1. The Notice of Motion dated 23rd June, 2017 seeks the following orders:1) Spent. 2) That the Court be pleased to issue inhibition orders preventing any dealings on the register of Parcel No. Abogeta/U-Kiringa/846 pending the hearing and determination of this application and suit. 3) Costs of this application be provided for. 2. The application is based on the ground:1) That the defendant entered into an agreement for the sale of an Acre out of the above suit land with the plaintiff and fully paid the consideration. 2) That the defendant never transferred the parcel to the plaintiff even after granting possession to the plaintiff. 3) That the defendant is evicting /forcefully removing the plaintiff from the suit land if inhibition is not placed the applicant stand to suffer irreparably. 3. There is also a Supporting Affidavit of the applicant (filed on 28:06:17) in essence, what applicant is stating is that there is a need to preserve the land by way of an inhibition. That way the Suitland will not fall in the hands of the 3rd parties. The application was not opposed despite service having been effected. I find that the application is meritorious. Prayer 2 is allowed with no orders as to costs. DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 4 TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 IN THE PRESENCE OF: CA: Janet Kaimenyi h/b for M.G Kaume for Plaintiff Kithinji for defendant present Hon. L.N. MBUGUA ELC JUDGE
Original judgment
Wilfred Mwirigi Mugambi v Siriaka Gantuku Marko [2017] KEELC 195 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.