REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ELC CASE NO. 56 OF 2016 THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF MARSABIT.........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS BOARD OF MANAGEMENTBADASSA MIXED SECONDARY SCHOOL…1ST DEFENDANT THE PRINCIPAL BADASSA MIXED SECONDARY SCHOOL.…..................2ND DEFENDANT BIFTU CONTRACTORS LIMITED……………………………................….….3RD DEFENDANT CONSENT/ORDER 1. On 23:10:2017, the advocates for parties herein in this matter proffered the following Consent, which they asked the Court to adopt as its order. "BY CONSENT 1. That the 1st and 2nd Defendants shall identify and allocate to the Plaintiff, an alternate parcel of land measuring 100 acres in Jaldesa for use by the 1st Plaintiff’s Department of Agriculture and livestock. 2. That in return the Plaintiff shall effect a transfer of Plot No. 60 (the Suitland) from the Department of Agriculture and Livestock to the Department of Education, Science and Technology and facilitate the change of user from the Department of Agriculture and livestock to the Department of Education, Science and Technology. 3. That the suit herein be mention within 14 days to confirm settlement of terms. 2. The Consent filed on 24:10:17 is adopted as an order of the Court. 3. Parties shall bear their own costs. 4. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 IN THE PRESENCE OF:C.A: Janet/Haway Kiango for 1st and 2nd Defendants-present Mwalimu for Plaintiff –present Kithinji H/B for Halake for 3rd Defendant -present HON. L. N. MBUGUA ELC JUDGE
Original judgment
County Government of Marsabit v Board of Management Badassa Mixed Secondary School & 2 others [2017] KEELC 160 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.