REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ELC CASE NO. 308 OF 2017 MIRIAM NTHAMA MUTWIRI.......................PLAINTIFF VERSUS JOSEPH MUNGATHIA MACHOKI....1ST DEFENDANT GEOFFREY KAUMBUTHU...............2ND DEFENDANT ALBERT MUTABARI..........................3RD DEFENDANT CONSENT/ORDER 1. On 23.10.17, the advocates in this matter proffered the following Consent, which they asked the Court to adopt as its order. "BY CONSENT Application dated 10.10.17 is settled by way of maintaining status quo which entails that; i. None of the parties is to construct on the suit land. ii. Each party to continue occupying the portion of the land they are occupying. Pre Trial Conference before Deputy Registry on 29.11.17”. 2. I find that the Consent is properly signed and is binding upon the parties 3. Parties shall bear their own costs. 4. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 23rd DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 IN THE PRESENCE OF:C.A: Janet L. Kimathi for Plaintiff present Wamache for Defendants present HON. L. N. MBUGUA ELC JUDGE
Original judgment
Miriam Nthama Mutwiri v Joseph Mungathia Machoki & 2 others [2017] KEELC 38 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.