Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Patrick Mungiria M'akaibua v Simon Ithaiba Itirikia & 4 others [2016] KEELC 68 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU PETITION NO 33 OF 2016 IN THE MATTER OF ENFORCEMENT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND IN THE MATTER OF LAND PARCEL NOS. 474, 11589 AND 8118 ANKAMIA ADJUDICATION SECTION PATRICK MUNGIRIA M'AKAIBUA (PETITIONING AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ITIRIKIA ETHAIBA (DECEASED)..........................................................................PETITIONER/APPLICANT VERSUS SIMON ITHAIBA ITIRIKIA.................................................................1ST RESPONDENT JOSEPH MICHUBU GITIRIKIA........................................................2ND RESPONDENT GEORGE MUGAMBI MAINGI.........................................................3RD RESPONDENT DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION AND SETTLEMENT OFFICER-TIGANIA DISTRICT ............................…....4TH REPONDENT THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL....................................................5TH RESPONDENT RULING 1. The parties, in this Court on 21st December, 2016, proffered a Consent dated 21st December, 2016, which is in the following terms:“By Consent of the parties herein and that of their Advocates, the Petitioner shall not be evicted by the 1st , 2nd and 3rd Respondents from the 20 points of an acre he is occupying pending the hearing and determination of the Petition herein”. 2. The Consent is adopted as an order of this Court. 3. Costs shall be in the cause.

page 1 of 2

4. It is so ordered. DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016 IN THE PRESENCE OF: CA: Daniel/ James Nyagaka for the Petitioner D.J Mbaya for the 1st to 3rd Respondents P.M.NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.