Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Pg Security Limited v Isaac Ndiwa

PG Security Limited v Ndiwa (Civil Application E009 of 2026) [2026] KECA 447 (KLR) (6 March 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KECA 447 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT ELDORET CIVIL APPLICATION E009 OF 2026 PM GACHOKA, JA MARCH 6, 2026 BETWEEN PG SECURITY LIMITED ....................................................................... APPLICANT AND ISAAC NDIWA ..................................................................................... RESPONDENT (An Application for extension of time to lodge and serve the notice of appeal, memorandum of appeal and record of appeal out of time from the Judgment and Decree of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret (M. Onyango, J.) delivered on 10th July 2025 in ELRCA No. E013 of 2024) RULING 1. The Notice of Motion dated 28th November 2025 has supplicated the provisions of section 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 seeking for leave to file and serve the notice of appeal, memorandum of appeal and record of appeal out of time in appealing the judgment of Onyango, J delivered on 10th July 2025 in ELRCA No. E013 of 2024. The application is supported by the grounds on its face, together with the supporting affidavit of Grace Macheru, the applicant’s counsel on record. 2. The applicant contended that judgment in ELRCA No. E013 of 2024 was delivered on 10th July 2025. Thereafter, the applicant wrote to its erstwhile advocates inquiring about the outcome of the matter. However, his inquiry only elicited a response on 13th August 2025 when he was outside the statutory limits to file the appeal. The applicant was dissatisfied with the outcome prompting it to instruct his advocates to file an appeal. However, the appeal was not filed. It is then that the applicant instructed its current firm of advocates. 3. The applicant urged this Court to allow the application for the reason that the delay was not deliberate, it was not inordinate and that its appeal had high chances of success. Finally, the applicant contended https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/447/eng@2026-03-06 1

page 1 of 2

that it stood to suffer irreparable loss and damage if the orders sought are not granted. The respondent has not filed submissions. 4. I have considered the application and analyzed the law. The applicant seeks to file his notice of appeal, memorandum of appeal and record of appeal out of time. The applicant has urged this Court to invoke the discretion set out in rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022 which is wide and not exhaustive. In determining an application of this nature, this Court is alive to the factors taken into account namely the merit of the appeal, the prejudice, if any, to be suffered by the respondent and the period and length of delay. [See Paul Wanjohi Mathenge v Duncan Gichane Mathenge [2013] eKLR. 5. I have considered the reasons advanced by the applicant and the period it took to file the appeal. I find that the applicant deserves to benefit from the exercise of the Court’s discretion set out in rule 4 of this Court’s Rules. 6. Accordingly, the applicant shall file its notice of appeal, memorandum of appeal and record of appeal within 30 days from the date of this order failing which the orders issued shall lapse automatically without any further reference to this Court. The costs of the application shall abide the outcome of the appeal. DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026. M. GACHOKA C.Arb, FCIArb. ...................................... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. Signed. DEPUTY REGISTRAR https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/447/eng@2026-03-06 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.