Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Reuben Mogoa Mongeri v Republic

Mongeri v Republic (Criminal Application E062 of 2025) [2026] KECA 224 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KECA 224 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPLICATION E062 OF 2025 LK KIMARU, JA FEBRUARY 10, 2026 BETWEEN REUBEN MOGOA MONGERI .............................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (Being an application for extension of time to appeal out of time from the Judgment of Kenya at Kisii (T. Odera, J) in HCCRA. E060 of 2024) RULING 1. The applicant, Reuben Mogoa Mongeri, was convicted by the trial court of the ofience of defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act. He was sentenced to serve ten (10) years imprisonment. His appeal to the High Court was dismissed. However, the custodial sentence that was imposed by the trial Court was enhanced to twenty (20) years imprisonment. The applicant was aggrieved by this decision and desires to appeal against the same to this Court. He has made the present application seeking to be granted extension of time to appeal out of time. The applicant states that he was prevented from lodging the appeal in time due to financial challenge of his family. They could not procure funds in time to enable them instruct an advocate to file the appeal on his behalf. The application is supported by the annexed affidavit of the applicant. 2. The respondent does not oppose the application. Victorine Kitoto, swore a replying affidavit on behalf of the respondent indicating their intention not to oppose the application. Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules grants this Court unfettered discretion to determine whether or not to grant an application for extension of time. In the present application, this Court is satisfied by the reasons given by the applicant for the delay in lodging the appeal in time. This Court formed the view that the applicant should be allowed to ventilate his right of second appeal to this Court. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/224/eng@2026-02-10 1

page 1 of 2

3. The application has merit and is hereby allowed. The applicant is granted leave to lodge the appeal out of time. The notice of appeal shall be filed and served within fourteen (14) days of today’s date. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY,2026. L. KIMARU ......................... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/224/eng@2026-02-10 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.