Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Gabriel Wambwire Barasa v Republic

Barasa, v Republic (Criminal Application E117 of 2024) [2025] KECA 2282 (KLR) (19 December 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KECA 2282 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPLICATION E117 OF 2024 HA OMONDI, JA DECEMBER 19, 2025 BETWEEN GABRIEL WAMBWIRE BARASA, ........................................................ APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (Being an application seeking leave to appeal out of time against both conviction and sentence against the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Busia (Kihara, J.) dated 25th May 2014 in Misc. Criminal Application No 103 of 2006) RULING 1. The applicant, Gabriel Wambwire Barasa, was charged in the magistrate’s court at Bondo with the oence of rape contrary to section 3 of the Sexual Offences Act. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to serve life imprisonment on 25th April 2006. Aggrieved, he moved to the High Court on appeal vide HCCR Application No 103 of 2006 which was dismissed in its entirety (Kihara, J.) on 25th day of May 2014. He however failed to le his appeal within the 14 days after delivery of judgment; but remains desirous of appealing to this Court. 2. In that regard, the applicant led this application dated 11th July 2024 seeking leave for extension of time to le appeal out of time. The application is premised on the grounds that the applicant after being served with the proceedings and Judgment of the High Court counted on his family members to hire an advocate, to prepare and le his appeal. Eventually, they were unable to secure the services of an advocate due to nancial constraints, a realization that dawned on him after the lapse of the period within which he ought to have led the appeal. 3. The respondent did not react to the application either by way of a replying adavit or written submissions. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/2282/eng@2025-12-19 1

page 1 of 2

4. I also take note that a copy of the release signal and letter sent to this Court dated 30th April, 2025, indicating that the applicant was released from lawful custody on grant of conditional pardon and remission of unexpired portion of his sentence, by the President of the Republic pursuant to powers conferred upon him by Article 133 of the Constitution of Kenya. This may explain why the applicant has not led any written submissions in prosecution of his appeal. The only reasonable inference to draw is that the application has been overtaken by events; and the applicant is no longer interested in pursuing this application. I therefore mark the application as abandoned and order the le closed, with leave to the applicant to revive the application if he so desires. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025. H. A. OMONDI ...................................... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/2282/eng@2025-12-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.