Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Cleophas Wesonga v Republic

Wesonga v Republic (Criminal Application E037 of 2024) [2025] KECA 1995 (KLR) (19 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KECA 1995 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPLICATION E037 OF 2024 MS ASIKE-MAKHANDIA, JA NOVEMBER 19, 2025 BETWEEN CLEOPHAS WESONGA .......................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (Being an application for leave to file an appeal out of time) RULING 1. Cleophas Wesonga, “the Applicant”, was tried, convicted and sentenced to suffer death for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296 (2) of the Penal Code in Criminal Case No. 1708 of 2000 at Bungoma Law Courts. His appeal to the High Court of Kenya at Bungoma being Criminal Appeal No.85 of 2005 was upon hearing dismissed in its entirety. The applicant now wishes to appeal against the judgment of the first appellate court in to this court. However the timelines of this Court for doing so under the Rules are long gone. It is for that reason that the applicant has mounted this application, dated 7th January, 2025 seeking leave to appeal out of time and as a pauper. 2. The main ground advanced by the applicant in support of the application is that he was not supplied with the judgment of the first appellate court for purposes of preparing and filing the intended appeal in time. When served with the application, the respondent in opposing the application retorted thus: “Upon perusal of the application and appreciation of the contents of supporting affidavit thereto, we oppose it. The appellant has not stated whether he filed a notice of appeal in the High Court so that the record of appeal may be supplied to him. We opine that the delay in filing the memoranda of appeal is inordinate and the reasons adduced in the supporting affidavit are not satisfactory. Consequently, we object to the application for extension of time to file an appeal.” 3. From the record, the applicant’s appeal was dismissed by the first appellate court on 25th May, 2005. This application was lodged on 7th January 2021. Whereas the delay of close to fifteen years appear https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/1995/eng@2025-11-19 1

page 1 of 2

very inordinate, considering however, the applicant's circumstances, it is not difficult to appreciate his situation. Whether he filed a Notice of Appeal in the first appellate court is neither here or there. The applicant has undoubted constitutional right to exhaust the appellate process and to deny him that right would be prejudicial to the applicant and considering further that the applicant was sentenced to death. The respondent will suffer no prejudice if the application is granted, as it will also have its day in court during the hearing of the intended appeal. 4. Accordingly, I allow the application and direct the applicant to process his appeal within the next fortyfive days from the date of this ruling. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 19 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025. ASIKE-MAKHANDIA ………………………………… JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original Deputy Registrar https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/1995/eng@2025-11-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.