Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mwiti v Kenya Power and Lighting Company & another

Mwiti v Kenya Power and Lighting Company & another (Civil Application 151 of 2018) [2022] KECA 1431 (KLR) (14 October 2022) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2022] KECA 1431 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI CIVIL APPLICATION 151 OF 2018 W KARANJA, JA OCTOBER 14, 2022 BETWEEN ELPHAS MWITI ....................................................................................... APPLICANT AND KENYA POWER AND LIGHTING COMPANY ....................... 1ST RESPONDENT HON ATTORNEY GENERAL .................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT (Application seeking extension of time within which to file reference from the decision of the Court of Appeal at Nyeri (J,Mohamed. J.A) dated 7th August 2020 in Nyeri COA Civil Application No. 151 of 2018) RULING 1. On August 7, 2020 this court, (J.Mohamed, JA) sitting as single judge dismissed the applicant’s motion for extension of time to le an appeal out of time against the judgment of the High Court (Ngaah Jairus, J) delivered on April 20, 2016. Following the said dismissal, the only recourse available to the applicant pursuant to rule 55 (1) b of the Court of Appeal Rules was to either orally request the court to refer the matter for reference before a full bench, or write to the registrar of the court within 7 days and request for the said reference. The applicant did not do so. It would appear that he led this application which I am sad to say has serious challenges. To start with I cannot tell the date the application was led. Figure this. The application is dated 21st Monday 2020. The court stamp from the registry on the other hand reads 30th September 20. Putting the two dates together, I can safely conclude that the application could have been led on September 21, 2020. 2. In the application, the applicant seeks leave to appeal out of time; he asks for a review of the ruling of Judge J. Mohammed dismissing his application; and that the court “constructs” a 3 judge bench to hear his application. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/1431/eng@2022-10-14 1

page 1 of 2

This application is a non- starter for the following reasons. Firstly, this is not a reference to full court. I have explained the process to be followed when one is dissatised with a decision of single judge. He did not request for a reference as provided under rule 55 (1) b but instead led this application which as it stands is incompetent. I have no jurisdiction to review the decision of the single judge; nor can I “construct” a bench to hear the applicant’s application. 3. Consequently, I nd this application irredeemably bad in law and devoid of merit and dismiss it with no order as to costs. DATED AND DELIVERED AT NYERI THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022. W. KARANJA ….……………………………. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/1431/eng@2022-10-14 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.