Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Loice Akoth Kawaka & another v Oscar Oluoch Ouma, Orange Democratic Party, Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & Returning Officer Ndhiwa Constituency

Kawaka & another v Ouma & 3 others (Civil Appeal E168 of 2022) [2022] KECA 623 (KLR) (14 July 2022) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2022] KECA 623 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CIVIL APPEAL E168 OF 2022 PO KIAGE, HA OMONDI & F TUIYOTT, JJA JULY 14, 2022 BETWEEN LOICE AKOTH KAWAKA ............................................................... 1ST APPELLANT ROSELINE AKOTH AWINO .......................................................... 2ND APPELLANT AND OSCAR OLUOCH OUMA ............................................................ 1ST RESPONDENT ORANGE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ............................................. 2ND RESPONDENT INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION .... 3RD RESPONDENT RETURNING OFFICER NDHIWA CONSTITUENCY ........... 4TH RESPONDENT (An Appeal from the Judgment and Orders of the High Court of Kenya at Homa Bay (Waweru Kiarie, J.) Dated 6th July, 2022 in Petition No. 1 of 2022) JUDGMENT 1 We have carefully considered the memorandum of appeal, the record of appeal, the written submissions and authorities led by the parties herein. 2 We have also paid careful attention and given due consideration to the oral arguments made by learned counsel who appeared before us, namely; Mr. Ochiel Dudley for the appellants and Mr. Muganda for the 3rd and 4th respondents, who also support the appeal, as well as Mr. Duncan Okatch for the 1st respondent and Ms. Masaai, for the 2nd respondent who are opposed to it. 3 Our decision on the appeal is that the learned Kiarie J, erred in allowing with costs the petition that was before him, quashing the decision of the 3rd Respondent’s Dispute Resolution Committee made on 17th June, 2022 and issuing a writ mandamus against the 3rd Respondent. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/623/eng@2022-07-14 1

page 1 of 2

4 We accordingly allow this appeal and set aside in entirety the learned Judge’s judgment and decree dated 6th July, 2022. We substitute therefor an order dismissing the petition, but with no order as to costs. The parties herein shall bear own costs of this appeal. 5 This decision is rendered pursuant to Rule 34 (7) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022, the reasons wherefor shall be given on 29th July, 2022. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2022. P.O. KIAGE ............................... JUDGE OF APPEAL H. OMONDI ............................... JUDGE OF APPEAL F. TUIYOTT ............................... JUDGE OF APPEAL. I certify that this is a true copy of the original. SIGNED DEPUTY REGISTRAR. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/623/eng@2022-07-14 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.