Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Holiday Investments (k) Ltd & 2 others v Fidelity Commercial Bank

Holiday Investments (K) Ltd & 2 others v Fidelity Commercial Bank (Civil Application 142 of 2013) [2021] KECA 162 (KLR) (19 November 2021) (Order) Neutral citation: [2021] KECA 162 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION 142 OF 2013 HA OMONDI, KI LAIBUTA & DK MUSINGA, JJA NOVEMBER 19, 2021 BETWEEN HOLIDAY INVESTMENTS (K) LTD ............................................... 1ST APPLICANT BENSON W.K. MUIGAI ................................................................... 2ND APPLICANT PAULINE K. MUIGAI ....................................................................... 3RD APPLICANT AND FIDELITY COMMERCIAL BANK .................................................... RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hatari Waweru, J.) dated 18th June, 2013 in Civil Appeal No. 196 of 2012) ORDER 1. This application was wrongly listed for hearing today because by an Order of this Court dated 15thnNovember 2018, the application was marked as withdrawn by consent of both parties. This file is hereby marked as closed as the said application has been spent. MADE AT MOMBASA THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021. D. MUSINGA, (P) ........................................ JUDGE OF APPEAL H. OMONDI ....................................... JUDGE OF APPEAL K. LAIBUTA https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2021/162/eng@2021-11-19 1

page 1 of 2

....................................... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original DEPUTY REGISTRAR https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2021/162/eng@2021-11-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.