Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Alice Mwikali Ngumbi & 7 others v Sabina Mumbua Ngumbi

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: KARANJA, JA. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 99 OF 2020 BETWEEN ALICE MWIKALI NGUMBI...................1ST APPLICANT SAMMY NGANDA NGUMBI..................2ND APPLICANT PETER NGILA NGUMBI..........................3RD APPLICANT JOHN CARTHESE NGUMBI....................4TH APPLICANT STEPHEN MUSELI NGUMBI..................5TH APPLICANT AMOS KYONDU NGUMBI.......................6TH APPLICANT JOSEPH MUNYENYI NGUMBI...............7TH APPLICANT CHRISTINE NGINA NGUMBI.................8TH APPLICANT AND SABINA MUMBUA NGUMBI.......................RESPONDENT (An application for extension of time to lodge an application for special leave as well as seek leave to appeal against part of the Ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Machakos (D. K. Kemei, J.) dated and delivered on 30th July, 2019 which dismissed the summons for Revocation of grant dated 20th November, 2017 in H.C. Succession Cause No. 55 of 2016) ****************** RULING The parties herein are exactly the same parties in Civil Application No. 20 of 2020. The orders sought are the same and the only difference is that the applications are filed by different firms of advocates. I have considered the prayers in Civil Application No. 20/20 and rendered my Ruling in that file. That Ruling will apply mutatis mutandis to this application. I so order. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 7th day of August, 2020. W. KARANJA ........................................ JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original.

page 1 of 2

Signed DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.