Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Samuel Sang & another v Kenya Industrial Estate Limited [2009] KECA 381 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal (Appli) 69 of 2008 SAMUEL SANG.......................................1ST APPLICANT/RESPONDENT HEMA INVESTMENT LTD........................2ND APPLICANT/RESPONDENT AND KENYA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE LIMITED...........RESPONDENT/APPELLANT (An application to strike out record of appeal lodged on 25thApril, 2008 from the judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi ( Visram, J.) dated 21st January, 2004 in H.C.C.C. NO. 994 OF 1998) ************************ RULING OF THE COURT The notice of motion dated 29th May, 2008 and filed on 3rd June, 2008 seeks four orders but only one is relevant for purposes of our ruling. The order sought is that the record of appeal lodged on 25 th April, 2008 be struck out for several reasons. Once again, some of those reasons are not relevant for purposes of our ruling and we make no reference to them. What is relevant, and is conceded by the appellant in the main appeal, is that an exhibit [Exhibit I(c] was produced during the hearing of the suit in the superior court but that exhibit is not included in the record of appeal. The submission made by learned counsel for the applicant Mr. Omotii, and conceded by Mr. Ngii, Learned counsel or the respondent, is that the exhibit is a primary document without which the appeal is rendered incurably defective. We agree. In the circumstances we are bound to grant the application on that ground alone and we now do so. We order that the record of appeal be and is hereby struck out. As for costs, the applicant did concede that some prayers made were unnecessary and the record of appeal confirms so. Mr. Omotii apologized for seeking orders on the basis of those assertions. We think it would be fair therefore to deprive him of the costs of this application. The applicant shall nevertheless have costs of the struck out appeal. It is so ordered. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 13th day of March, 2009.

page 1 of 2

R.S.C. OMOLO ............................ JUDGE OF APPEAL P.N. WAKI ............................ JUDGE OF APPEAL D.K.S. AGANYANYA ............................ JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.