Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

1. Dimken Kenya Limited 2. Dick Maina Githaiga 3. Sarah Gathoni Maina 4. James Wahome Githaiga 5. Kellychard N. Githaiga v Barclays Bank of Kenya Moses Kamatu

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appli 120 of 2002 (UR 65/2002) 1. DIMKEN KENYA LIMITED 2. DICK MAINA GITHAIGA 3. SARAH GATHONI MAINA 4. JAMES WAHOME GITHAIGA 5. KELLYCHARD N. GITHAIGA.................................APPLICANTS AND BARCLAYS BANK OF KENYA MOSES KAMATU................................................. RESPONDENTS (Application for an injunction pending the lodging and hearing of an intended appeal from the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Ringera, J.) dated 12th April, 2002 in H.C.C.C. NO. 186 OF 2000) ********************* ORDER OF THE COURT At the hearing of the notice of motion dated 16th May, 2002, Mr. Mungai, learned counsel for the applicants applied for leave to withdraw the application on the ground that the application has been overtaken by events as the applicants had filed Civil Appeal No. 244 of 2002 which was dismissed by this Court on 8th June, 2007. Miss. Karanja, learned counsel for the 1 st respondent, not objecting, leave to withdraw the application is granted with the result that the application is withdrawn under Rule 55 (6) of the Court of Appeal Rules with no orders as to costs.

page 1 of 2

Dated at Nairobi this 17th day of June, 2009. R. S. C. OMOLO .............................. JUDGE OF APPEAL E. M. GITHINJI ............................ JUDGE OF APPEAL D. K. S. AGANYANYA ............................ JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.