Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Psiongo Mwomareng v Republic [2007] KECA 393 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT ELDORET CRIMINAL APPEAL 209 OF 2005 PSIONGO MWOMARENG …………..….……………… APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ………………….………………………… RESPONDENT (An Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Kitale (Karanja, J) dated 16th June, 2005 In H.C.CR. A. No. 41 of 2004) ***************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The appellant pleaded guilty to two counts; the first one of attempted murder contrary to section 220 (a) of the Penal Code, and the second one of being in possession of a firearm without a firearm certificate contrary to section 4 of the Firearms Act, Cap 114 of the Laws of Kenya. He was sentenced respectively to ten (10) years and three (3) years imprisonment. His first appeal to the High Court was allowed in the second count, but was dismissed in the first count. In the appeal before us, as was the appeal to the High Court the appellant’s complaint is against severity of sentence. This being a second appeal, we are guided by the provisions of section 361 (1) (a) of the Criminal Procedure Code. According to that section, no second appeal lies on a question of fact, and by dint of that section, severity of sentence is a question of fact. That being the case, the appellant’s appeal being against severity of sentence is incompetent and it is accordingly dismissed. Dated and delivered at Eldoret this 20th day of February, 2007. S.E.O. BOSIRE …………………..

page 1 of 2

JUDGE OF APPEAL E.M. GITHINJI …………………... JUDGE OF APPEAL J.W. ONYANGO OTIENO ………………….. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.