Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mnala Koita v Justus Obukuse

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU Civil Appli 97 of 2004 MNALA KOITA…………………………...……………….…………. APPLICANT AND JUSTUS OBUKUSE…………………....……………...…………… RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to lodge and serve notice and record of appeal out of time in an intended appeal from the ruling and order of the High Court of Kenya kamega (Tanui J) dated 16th January, 1997 in H.C.C.A No.63 of 1992) **************** ORDER Neither the applicants who have made the reference to the Court nor their advocates, M/s. Lugadiru & Co. Advocates, are here. The advocates were served and must be aware of today’s hearing. The respondent is present. In those circumstances, we see no good reason to adjourn the reference and we order that it be and is hereby dismissed with costs to the respondent under rule 55(1) of the Court’s Rules. Dated and delivered at Kisumu this 21st day of March, 2007. R.S.C. OMOLO ………………………….. JUDGE OF APPEAL S.E.O. BOSIRE ……………………………. JUDGE OF APPEAL W.S. DEVERELLL

page 1 of 2

…………………………….. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.