Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Julia Wacheke Mungai v Betty Ngendo Gachie, Amosam Builders & Development Ltd & Nakuru Municipal Council

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA PEAL AT NAKURU Civil Appli Nai 332 of 2005 (NAK. 16/2005) BETWEEN JULIA WACHEKE MUNGAI………………………………………...APPLICANT AND 1. BETTY NGENDO GACHIE……………………..……..….1ST RESPONDENT 2. AMOSAM BUILDERS & DEVELOPMENT LTD…...…2ND RESPONDENT 3. NAKURU MUNICIPAL COUNCIL……………..…..…...3RD RESPONDENT (An application for extension of time to lodge and serve a Notice and Record of Appeal out of time from the Judgment & decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Mr Justice Rimita ) dated 26th January, 2001 in HCCC NO. 104 OF 1992) *********************** RULING Neither the 1st nor the 2nd respondents whose respective advocates are present opposes the applicant’s notice of motion for enlargement of time. The third respondent was also served with notice for today’s hearing but is not present to oppose the motion. In the circumstances, I allow the applicant’s notice of motion dated 14th November, 2005 and make the following orders:1. The applicant shall lodge and serve her notice of appeal within seven days of the date hereof. 2. The applicant shall lodge her record of appeal within fourteen days from the date the notice of appeal is lodged in Court. The record of appeal must thereafter be served on the respondents within seven days from the date of its lodgment in Court. 3. The costs of the present motion shall be in the intended appeal. Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 1st day of March, 2006. R.S.C. OMOLO

page 1 of 2

………………… JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.