Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Christopher Lopeite Lokai v Republic [2004] KECA 115 (KLR)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT ELDORET CORAM: GICHERU, C.J., TUNOI, J.A & DEVERELL , AG.J.A CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 164 OF 2003 BETWEEN CHRISTOPHER LOPEITE LOKAI………………………..APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC………………..………………………………RESPONDENT (Appeal from a sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Kitale (Birech, C.A) dated 17/7/2003 in H.C.CR.C. NO. 7 OF 2000 ************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The appellant was sentenced to 6 years imprisonment after pleading guilty to the offence of manslaughter contrary to section 205 of the Penal Code on 17.7.03. He had been in custody for a period of 4 years and 7 months. Although the Commissioner of Assize while sentencing the appellant said that he had taken into account the period the appellant had been in custody, we do not think that he did so.Considering that the offence for which the appellant was convicted and sentenced was committed in circumstances of a drunken brawl we think that taking into account the period the appellant had been in custody, the sentence of six years imprisonment was harsh in the circumstances. We consider that a sentence of 4 years imprisonment would have been appropriate. In the result, we allow the appellant’s appeal to the extent that his sentence of six years imprisonment is reduced to one of 4 years imprisonment. It is so ordered. Dated and delivered at Eldoret this 28 th day of September,2004.

page 1 of 2

J.E. GICHERU ………………………… CHIEF JUSTICE P.K. TUNOI …………………… …. JUDGE OF APPEAL W.S. DEVERELL ………………………… AG. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.