Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Anthony Wachira Ndumbi v Eunice Wakabari Karoki & another [2004] KECA 54 (KLR)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: TUNOI, O’KUBASU JJ.A & ONYANGO OTIENO AG. J.A) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 110 OF 2004 (UR. 59/2004) BETWEEN ANTHONY WACHIRA NDUMBI..…….…..…………………………..…..….APPLICANT AND EUNICE WAKABARI KAROKI…..……………..…..……………….. 1ST RESPONDENT MARY WANJIRA KONDU……………………………………….…. 2ND RESPONDENT (An application for stay of execution pending an intended appeal from the order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (J.B Ojwang, J.) dated 15.12.2003 in H.C.C.C. NO. 37 OF 2002 (0S) ************************** RULING OF THE COURT We allow the application for adjournment to enable counsel for the applicant to prepare his application. In this respect we grant the applicant leave to file a supplementary record to incorporate the documents he wishes to rely on in his Motion. This has to be done within 14 days hereof. However, the application is removed from the Urgency List and shall be fixed for hearing in the Registry in the normal way. The 1st respondent shall remain in exclusive possession of the suit land until further orders of the Court. We also order an interim stay of orders made by Ojwang J. on 15th December, 2003 in HCCC No. 37 of 2002 (OS). The costs occasioned by this adjournment are awarded to the respondents. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 6th day of October, 2004. P.K. TUNOI ……………. JUDGE OF APPEAL

page 1 of 2

E.O. O’KUBASU ……………… JUDGE OF APPEAL J.W. ONYANGO OTIENO ………………… AG. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.