REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: KWACH, LAKHA & OWUOR, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 234 OF 1999 BETWEEN EVANS GUNDO ..............................................APPELLANT AND NAFTALI SULE ............................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Kisumu (Justice Wambilyangah) dated the 23rd day of February, 1999 in H.C.C.C. NO. 251 OF 1998) **************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Having briefly heard the advocates for the parties, we are satisfied that the Court granted relief and gave judgment on the basis of a pleading which did not pray for the same. This amounted to no judgment - relief on the basis of matters not pleaded. The appeal is, therefore, allowed with costs, the decree of the superior court is set aside and the case is puremitted to the superior court for a new trial on a priority basis before another judge rsuant to rule 31 of the Rules of this Court. Dated and delivered at Kisumu this 13th day of March, 2002. R.O. KWACH ................... JUDGE OF APPEAL A.A. LAKHA .................. JUDGE OF APPEAL E. OWUOR ................... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR
Original judgment
Evans Gundo v Naftali Sule [2002] KECA 250 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.