Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Shirley Luckhurst v K.H. Osmond Advocate & another [2002] KECA 242 (KLR)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: LAKHA, OWUOR & O'KUBASU, JJ.A) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 254 OF 2001 BETWEEN SHIRLEY LUCKHURST ................................................... APPLICANT AND K.H. OSMOND ADVOCATE .............................. 1ST RESPONDENT S.M. MWENESI .................................................. 2ND RESPONDENT (Application to strike out a Notice of appeal in an intended appeal from the Ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi(Mr. Justice Githinji) dated 17th May, 2000 in H.C.C.C NO. 3012 OF 1997 (O.S) *************** RULING OF THE COURT The application before us is for striking out the Notice of appeal filed herein on 24th May, 2000 on the ground that the time for filing the intended appeal has expired. We are satisfied and in the absence of any evidence that the alleged letter requesting for the proceedings from the registry was indeed received and copied to the applicant, the time has expired and the respondents cannot take advantage of the proviso to Rule 81(2). In that regard, the Notice of appeal is hereby struck out with costs to the applicant. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 28th day of May, 2002. A. A. LAKH ............... JUDGE OF APPEAL E. OWUOR .............. JUDGE OF APPEAL E. O. O'KUBASU

page 1 of 2

............... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.