Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Titus Kiragu v Agricultural Development Corporation

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU CORAM: SHAH, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 354 OF 2001 (189/01 UR) BETWEEN TITUS KIRAGU ............................................................... APPLICANT AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ..........RESPONDENT (An application for leave to extend time to file and serve the record of appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Rimita J) dated 22nd September, 2000

page 1 of 2

in NKR. H.C.C.C. NO. 111 OF 1999) ********************* RULING This application is not being opposed. Counsel have agreed that the record of appeal be lodged within the next 28 days. Costs are also agreed. In the circumstances I order that the record of appeal be lodged within the next 28 days, that is, by 19th March, 2002. The respondent will have costs of this application agreed at KShs.2,000/= to be paid within 28 days failing which execution may issue. Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 19th day of February, 2002. A.B. SHAH ........................ JUDGE I certify OF that DEPUTY REGISTRAR this is a APPEAL true copy of the original.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.