IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, LAKHA & KEIWUA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 47 OF 2001 (28/2001 UR) BETWEEN RUTH WANZA NDUMBU ........................................... APPLICANT AND SYMON MWANGI KIMARU ................................... RESPONDENT (Application for stay of Execution pending an intended appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Ramsey, Commissioner of Assize) dated 10th day of May, 2000 in H.C.C.C. NO. 275 OF 1999) ************* RULING OF THE COURT This is an application for stay under rule 5(2)(b). Having carefully considered the submissions made by the respondent, we are not persuaded that the applicant has any arguable appeal. Nor are we satisfied that the appeal will be rendered nugatory if a stay is withheld. Much as we sympathise with the predicament in which the applicant finds herself this Court does not act on emotions or sympathies. The application fails and is dismissed with costs. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 7th day of May, 2001. R.S.C. OMOLO ............................ JUDGE OF APPEAL A.A. LAKHA ...................... JUDGE OF APPEAL M. KEIWUA .......................... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR
Original judgment
Ruth Wanza Ndumbu v Symon Mwangi Kimaru [2001] KECA 233 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.