Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

RUWA NZAI vs REPUBLIC [2001] KECA 167 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: OMOLO, LAKHA & O'KUBASU, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2000 BETWEEN RUWA NZAI................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Mr. Justice Waki) dated 5th March, 1999 in H.C.CR.A. NO. 267 OF 1996) ********************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: The appellant's plea to this Court is really one for mercy. In his memorandum of appeal, he merely sets out what he calls 'MITIGATION." The sentence was severe but we think it was eminently deserved in the circumstances of the case. The appellant sexually molested the young daughter of his woman friend of eight years and once the court below was satisfied that he did so, the sentence was bound to be severe. Even if we thought the sentence was harsh and excessive, which we do not, we would have no power to interfere. We dismiss the appeal and that shall be our order. Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 23rd day of January, 2001. R.S.C. OMOLO ............... JUDGE OF APPEAL A.A. LAKHA ................ JUDGE OF APPEAL E. O'KUBASU .............. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.