Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Suryakant Bhagwanji Raja Shah v Aperit Investments S.A. & another [2001] KECA 159 (KLR)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: AKIWUMI, SHAH & KEIWUA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 2 OF 2001 (UR.2/2001) BETWEEN SURYAKANT BHAGWANJI RAJA SHAH ........................... APPLICANT AND 1. APERIT INVESTMENTS S.A. 2. SATISHCHANDRA BHIMJI SHAH .......................... RESPONDENTS RULING OF THE COURT There seems to be some confusion as to the role of Salim Dhanji & Co. as Advocates for the Applicant. An application in that respect is now pending in the High Court and which is to be heard on 26.2.2001. In our view this should be determined first. In the result the application before us is adjourned to 27.2.2001 for mention before this court. Until the hearing of this application, interim stay as sought before us is hereby granted. Costs in the cause. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 23rd day of January, 2001. A. M. AKIWUMI ............................. JUDGE OF APPEAL A. B. SHAH .......................... JUDGE OF APPEAL M. KEIWUA .......................... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.