Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

DOROTHY K. KWONYIKE t/a LUGUYAN ENTERPRISES vs VICTORIA COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED [2000] KECA 277 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: KWACH, AKIWUMI & BOSIRE, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 79 OF 2000 (UR.35/00) BETWEEN DOROTHY K. KWONYIKE T/A LUGUYAN ENTERPRISES ..................................... APPLICANT AND VICTORIA COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED ....................... RESPONDENT RULING OF THE COURT The order of Mulwa, J. made on 9.3.00 has not been obeyed. This is also admitted by Mr. Nyawara counsel for the Applicant who it appears does not, however, regard it as being a proper interpretation of the original order made by Gacheche, CA. But this notwithstanding, the position in law as set out clearly in The Pharmacy and Poisons Board v Sipri Pharmaceuticals Limited & the Republic Civil Application No. NAI 103 of 1998 (43/98 UR) (unreported), is that no matter whether the order of Mulwa, J. be right or wrong, it must, unless properly set aside by way of review or an appeal, be complied with. This the Applicant has not done and for that reason, we agree with Mr. Wasuna, counsel for the Respondent, that the present application cannot be heard until the order of Mulwa, J. is complied with or set aside. The present application is hereby taken out of today's list and stood over generally. Today's cost to the Respondent. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 12th day of April, 2000. R. O. KWACH .................. JUDGE OF APPEAL A. M. AKIWUMI .................. JUDGE OF APPEAL S. E. O. BOSIRE .................. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.