Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

George Omondi Odek v Jagdish Kotecha & another [2000] KECA 171 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CORAM: KWACH, AKIWUMI & O'KUBASU, JJ.A. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 331 OF 1999 (UR 130/99) BETWEEN GEORGE OMONDI ODEK ........................................APPLICANT AND JAGDISH KOTECHA MIDLAND EMPORIUM .....................................RESPONDENTS (Application for stay of orders pending hearing and determination of an intended appeal from the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Kisumu (Birech C/Assize) dated 22nd October, 1999 in H.C.C.C. NO. 321 OF 1999) **************** RULING OF THE COURT The present application for stay on the grounds, inter alia, that failure to grant it will render the intended appeal nugatory, is not supported at all by the supporting affidavit. Furthermore, the proceedings included in the record before us is so confusing that it is impossible to establish what order is the real subject of the present application. In the circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the application with costs for the respondents assessed at 5,000/= to be paid within 7 days from today failing which, execution to issue. Dated and delivered at Kisumu this 21st day of March, 2000. R. O. KWACH JUDGE OF APPEAL A. M. AKIWUMI JUDGE OF APPEAL

page 1 of 2

E. O. O'KUBASU JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.