Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jeremiah Mogire Mbeche v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CORAM: GICHERU, AKIWUMI & KEIWUA, JJ.A. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2000 BETWEEN JEREMIAH MOGIRE MBECHE ...............APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ...........................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Kisii (Hon. Mr. Justice Waweru) dated 31st August,1999 in H.C.CR. CASE NO. 37 OF 1999) ***************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: In his notes on sentence, the learned trial judge observed that it was easy to understand the appellant's anger on discovering that his wife, now deceased, stole a large sum of money from him. He also observed that that not withstanding, the appellant had no right to viciously attack the deceased in order to extract a confession from her. The deceased had taken Kshs.6,000/= from the appellant's coat pocket and had given it to her cousin called John. On questioning by the appellant, she had refused to own up the taking of that money the result of which he assaulted her with a piece of firewood on the head inflicting serious head injuries which resulted in her death soon thereafter. It was during that assault that the deceased confessed having taken the money in question and given it to her cousin. The mitigation proffered on behalf of the appellant by his counsel in the superior court after his plea of guilty and conviction for the offence of manslaughter was similar to what has been urged before us by counsel now appearing for him. This mitigation centres around the welfare of his 14 children now left without anyone to fend for them. However, even taking into account the plight of the said children, it is important to note that this is a Court of law and not of sympathy. The sentence of 7 years imprisonment meted against the appellant was legal and in the circumstances of the facts before the learned trial judge it was not manifestly excessive him having taken into account all the mitigating factors proffered before him on behalf of the appellant. We are unable to fault the learned trial judge in this regard and in the result we can find no merit in the appellant's appeal. The same is therefore dismissed.

page 1 of 2

Dated at Kisumu this 22nd day of November, 2000. J. E. GICHERU ........................ JUDGE OF APPEAL A. M. AKIWUMI ....................... JUDGE OF APPEAL M. KEIWUA .......................... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.