Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Shem Okeyo Onyango v Camlus Oduor Madialo

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASAIN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Gicheru, Tunoi & Lakha, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 197 OF 1998 BETWEEN SHEM OKEYO ONYANGO.................................APPELLANT AND CAMLUS ODUOR MADIALO..........................RESPONDENT (An appeal from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of Kenya at Kisumu (Wambilyangah, J.) dated 21st April, 1998 in H.C.C.C. NO. 107 OF 1992) ************************* ORDER OF THE COURT: Counsel for the appellant concedes that the record of this appeal does not contain a certified copy of the order appealed from as is mandatorily required by rule 85(1)(h) of the Court of Appeal Rules. In the result the said appeal is incompetent and is struck out with costs to the respondent as the point of non-inclusion of the certified copy of the order appealed from was raised in the respondent's application to strike out this appeal. Dated and delivered this 24th day of November, 1999. J.E. ................ JUDGE P.K. ................ JUDGE A.A. ............... JUDGE OF APPEAL GICHERU OF APPEAL TUNOI OF APPEAL LAKHA I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.