Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

TWIGA CHEMICAL vs JORAM KIVAIRU [1999] KECA 173 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: LAKHA, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 195 OF 1999 (77/99UR) BETWEEN TWIGA CHEMICAL .................................... 1STAPPLICANT LUCAS INDECHE IMBILA .............................. 2ND APPLICANT AND JORAM KIVAIRU ........................................RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to file and serve record of appeal from an Order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice Khamoni) dated 23rd January, 1998 in H.C.C.C. NO. 2377 OF 1988) ****************** RULING This is an application under rule 4 for an extension of time to file the record of appeal. The time to file the appeal expired on 6th December, 1998. The applicant on 9th June, 1999 was granted an extension upto 23rd June, 1999 to do so. This, however, was not done. Mr. Madara fell sick on 15th June, 1999 until 1st July, 1999. But he is not the only litigation lawyer in his Chambers. There is no explanation why another litigation lawyer available could not do so. If there are not enough litigation lawyers then the Chambers should have more. The record was ready by 1st July, 1999 and filed on 2nd July, 1999. But this application was not filed until 29th July, 1999. Again, there is no explanation for this delay. In all the circumstances, I am not satisfied that I should exercise my discretion in favour of the applicant as I do not consider, in all the circumstances, that this is a fit and proper case to do so. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 6th day of August, 1999. A.A. LAKHA ................. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.