REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA CORAM: KWACH, OMOLO & SHAH, JJ.A. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 43 OF 1999 BETWEEN LARS MICHAEL FLUGGE ...................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ..............................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Waki J) dated 24th March, 1999 in H.C.CR.A. NO. 161 OF 1998) ****************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT We are satisfied the High Court was not entitled to summarily reject the appeal under the provisions of section 352 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code . A casual look at the appellant's grounds of appeal to the High Court clearly shows that the appeal was not simply brought on the grounds that the conviction was against the weight of evidence or that the sentence was excessive. The grounds clearly transcended those grounds and that being so, the High Court had no jurisdiction to summarily reject the appeal. Mr. Gacivih for the Republic properly concedes the appeal. We allow the appeal, set aside the Judge's order of summary dismissal and remit the appeal to the High Court with a direction that the appeal be admitted to hearing and then determined according to law. We so order. Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 26th day of July, 1999. R. O. KWACH --------------JUDGE OF APPEAL R. S. C. OMOLO --------------JUDGE OF APPEAL A. B. SHAH --------------JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR
Original judgment
LARS MICHAEL FLUGGE vs REPUBLIC [1999] KECA 70 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.