Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

John Akarwa v Alfred Inatkimoso

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CORAM: KWACH, J.A (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 268 OF 1998 (KSM. 38/98) BETWEEN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 268 OF 1998 (KSM. 38/98) BETWEEN JOHN AKARWA...............................................APPLICANT AND ALFRED INATKIMOSO..................................RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to serve Notice of Appeal and file Records of Appeal out of time from the ruling and order of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega (Mr. Justice Tanui) dated 23rd February, 1998, in H.C.C.C. 258 OF 1992 *************** RULING This is an application under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal. It is not opposed by Mr. Omukunda for the respondent. The application is accordingly granted and the time for lodging the record of appeal is hereby extended to 15.1.99. Costs assessed at Shs.2,000/= to be paid by the respondent to the applicant as the former deliberately disregarded the process of the court and failed to appear either in person or by counsel on Tuesday 24.11.98 thereby causing unnecessary inconvenience to the applicant's advocate and the court. Payment within 7 days in default execution to issue. Made at Kisumu this 26th day of November, 1998. R. O. KWACH ................ JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.