Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

CHARLES WANJAU KARIMI vs REPUBLIC [1997] KECA 277 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, LAKHA JJ.A. & BOSIRE AG. J.A.) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. NAI 8 OF 1997 (NYR 5/97) BETWEEN CHARLES WANJAU KARIMI.....................................APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC.................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a conviction and judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nyeri (Mr. Justice J.L.A. Osiemo) dated 24th September, 1996 in H.C.CR. APPEAL NO. 226 OF 1995) ************ RULING OF THE COURT The applicant was convicted after a trial of seven counts of stealing by a person employed in the public service, contrary to s.280 of the Penal Code and a further count of fraudulent false accounting contrary to s.330(a) of the penal Code. His first appeal to the superior court against both conviction and sentence was dismissed. Thereafter the applicant did not make any application to the same court for bail pending appeal to this court as he should properly have done in view of the provisions of s.361 (b) of the Criminal Procedure Code as read with rule 41 of the Rules of this court. That being so, this application does not lie. Moreover, on the merits the applicant's intended appeal does not appear to us to have overwhelming chances of success. In the circumstances we find that it has no merit and is accordingly ordered dismissed. Dated at Nairobi this 21st day of April, 1997. R.S.C. OMOLO ................ JUDGE OF APPEAL A. A. LAKHA ................ JUDGE OF APPEAL S.E.O. BOSIRE ...................

page 1 of 2

AG. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. ................ DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.