Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Michael Mugo Kihara v Republic [1997] KECA 117 (KLR)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, LAKHA, JJ.A. & BOSIRE, AG.J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 90 OF 1996 BETWEEN MICHAEL MUGO KIHARA……………………….APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC………………………………….…… RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Conviction and Sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice V.V. Patel) dated 14th October, 1996 IN H.C.CR.A NO. 893 OF 1996) ************************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The appellant was convicted of burglary and theft contrary to Section 304(2) and 279(b) of the Penal Code. Upon a careful consideration of the evidence we are not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the Conviction. Mr. Bwonwongo for the Republic does not support the Conviction and is our opinion rightly so. Accordingly the appeal is allowed, conviction quashed and sentence set aside. He is to be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 21st day of April, 1997. R.S.C. OMOLO ……………………. JUDGE OF APPEAL A.A. LAKHA

page 1 of 2

……………………. JUDGE OF APPEAL S.E.O. BOSIRE ………………………….. AG. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.