Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Stephen Kagooiyo & 1 other v Joseph Waithaka Kabai & 3 others

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, AKIWUMI & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 313 OF 1995 BETWEEN STEPHEN KAGOOIYO………....……….........................1ST APPLICANT DANIEL MUCHOKI..........................................................2ND APPLICANT AND JOSEPH WAITHAKA KABAI……...…......................1ST RESPONDENT KAHATA MUCHAU.....................................................2ND RESPONDENT CHARLES KABOCHI NJEMA...................................3RD RESPONDENT GUCHU KIBARA t/a MATUU BUS SERVICE...........4TH RESPONDENT (Application to strike out Notice of Appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice Ringera) dated 6th March, 1995 in H.C.C.C. NO. 4089 OF 1988) **************** RULING OF THE COURT This is an application to strike out the Notice of Appeal 410 lodged in Court on 16th March, 1995 as an essential step in the proceedings has not been taken. Judgment of the superior court was delivered on 6th March, 1995; Notice of Appeal was filed on 16th March, 1995 and the proceedings of judgment were ready and available on 20th September, 1995 but no appeal has been filed to date. The time for filing appeal has now lapsed. Accordingly, the application succeeds and the Notice of Appeal lodged in Court on 16th March, 1995 is struck out with costs.

page 1 of 2

Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 29th day of April, 1996, R.S.C. OMOLO ......................... JUDGE OF APPEAL A.M. AKIWUMI .......................... JUDGE OF APPEAL A.A, LAKHA ........................... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original, DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Stephen Kagooiyo & 1 other v Joseph Waithaka Kabai & 3 others — Original judgment | Caselaw