Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rev. Peter A Indalo & 1 other v Fanana Investment Ltd

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: OMOLO, AKIWUMI & LAKHA JJ.A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 30 OF 1996 BETWEEN REV. PETER A INDALO……….……...………..APPELLANT OYANI CHRISTIAN RURAL SERVICES………..APPELLANT AND FANANA INVESTMENT LTD…….....………....RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Kisumu (Mr. Justice Mango) dated 29th July, 1993 IN H. C. C. APPEAL NO. 6 OF 1993) ***************************** RULING OF THE COURT An application has been made by the respondent to strike out the appeal under the rule 80 of the Rules of this court. It is conceded and, in our opinion rightly, by the appellants’ advocate that the appeal is out of time. The application made by the appellants for enlargement of time to file the record of appeal out of time, for the second time, will not be of assistance as the Notice of Appeal was filed out of time and no application has been made for enlargement of time to cure this. Accordingly, the application to strike out succeeds and it is granted with costs. In consequence, the appeal is struck out with costs. Made at Kisumu this 22nd day of March, 1996. R. S. C. OMOLO …………………. JUDGE OF APPEAL

page 1 of 2

A. M. AKIWUMI ……………………… JUDGE OF APPEAL A. A. LAKHA …………………….. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy f of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.