Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

MARTIN M. ODHIAMBO v REPUBLIC [1995] KECA 36 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA PEAL AT NAIROBI Criminal Appeal 3 of 1995 MARTIN M. ODHIAMBO ……………….................................…………………………APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ……………….............................……………………….………………RESPONDENT (Application for variation of bond terms in an intended appeal from the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Justice Ondeyo) dated 31st May, 1995 IN H. C. MISC. APPL. NO. 113 OF 1995) ******************************** RULING OF THE COURT The applicant has applied under rule 5(2) (a) for review of the bond granted by the High Court on the ground that the conditions of the bail are onerous. But the applicant being already on bail, he cannot again apply for bail. Furthermore, the applicant has not for obvious reasons not set out in his notice of appeal as required by r. 58, the conviction against which he has appealed. Finally. There can be no appeal to this court against the granting of bail. The application is hereby dismissed. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 31st July, 1995. A.M. COCKAR …………………… CHIEF JUSTICE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.