Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Peter Mwangi Kaniga v Republic [1994] KECA 37 (KLR)

REPUBLIC IN THE COURT AT Criminal Appeal 17 of 1994 OF OF APPEAL OF KENYA KENYA NAKURU PETER MWANGI KANIGA………………….............................……………………….APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC……………………………………..........................……………………..RESPONDENT (Appeal from a conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Mr. Justice B.K. Tanui) dated 6th November 1992 IN H.C.CR.A. NO. 213 OF 1991) ************************* JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The appellant was convicted of robbery contrary to section 296(1) of the Penal Code and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment plus 5 strokes of the cane followed by 5 years police supervision. His appeal to the Superior Court against both conviction and sentence was dismissed by Tanui J on 6 th November, 1992 and he now brings this second appeal. The appellant has raised a number of complaints including an allegation of being framed by the police, but this being a second appeal, he can only raise issues of law. The only issue of law available to the appellant is one of identification. As to this, the circumstances of identification were favourable and free from possibility of error. There was light and the appellant had no front upper teeth which was easily noticed by Paul Kariuki Mwangi (P.W.2), whom the appellant attached as he was counting money on a table. The appellant was properly identified and there can be no doubt that the conviction was proper. In the circumstances the appeal fails and is dismissed. Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 27th day of September, 1994. R.O. KWACH ……………………….. JUDGE OF APPEAL

page 1 of 2

M.G. MULI ………………………. JUDGE OF APPEAL P.K. TUNOI ………………………… JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.