Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

George Itiotia Karuku v Republic [1994] KECA 33 (KLR)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL 63 OF 1994 GEORGE ITIOTIA KARUKU………………………............…..APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC……………………......................................…RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Judgment, Order, or as the case may be) of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Mr. Justice T. Mbaluto) dated 15th October, 1993 IN H.C.CR.A. NO. 261 OF 1993) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT This is an appeal from the decision of the High Court in which the learned judge upheld the finding of the Magistrate to the effect that the appellant had knowingly disposed of by selling, and thereby committing the offence of stealing parts of an aircraft, which he well knew did not belong to him or to his superior whom he alleged, had asked him to cut up the aircraft. He also upheld the Magistrate's conclusion that the defence of "superior orders" was in the particular circumstances of the case, unavailable to the appellant. Even if the appellant's superior had instructed the appellant as alleged by the appellant, there was sufficient independent evidence which established that the appellant disposed of parts of the aircraft knowing full well that this was without the consent of owner of the aircraft. We have there two concurrent findings of fact with which more over, we are in full agreement. The appellant's grounds of appeal is to the effect that he did not demolish the aircraft on his own and sold the parts on the instructions of his superior. It may be well be that the appellant thought that the aircraft had been abandoned, but the circumstances of the case show clearly that this is not a case of "finders Keepers" on the basis of the concurrent finding of fact, we cannot but agree with the learned judge that the defence of "superior orders", as was indeed the same conclusion that the magistrate came to, cannot avail the appellant. In the result, we cannot but come to the conclusion that the appeal must be dismissed. It is so ordered. Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 18th day of July, 1994

page 1 of 2

J.M. GACHUHI ………………………… JUDGE OF APPEAL R.S.C. OMOLO ………………………… JUDGE OF APPEAL A.M. AKIWUMI ………………………. JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.