Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Losta Lotei Ngoroko v Republic [1982] KECA 45 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Madan, Miller and Potter, JJ.A ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.94 OF 1981 BETWEEN LOSTA LOTEI NGOROKO…………………APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC…………………………………RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Mead, J.) dated 31st January, 1981) in Criminal Appeal No. 392 of 1980) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT MADAN, J.A. This appellant was convicted of robbery, contrary to section 296(1) of the Penal Code. His appeal to the High Court was summarily rejected under section 352(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. He has appealed again, to us. The appellant was caught red-handed when running away after he struck his victim Mr. Jelli on the head with a rungu, and robbed him of his radio. Before Mr. Jelli became unconscious as a result of the blow on his head, he saw the appellant picking up his radio. Mr. Jelli was also bleeding, and had to be taken to hospital where he remained for several days. The appellant was chased by two police officers who finally caught him when he fell in a hole. He had dropped the radio in the chase. It was recovered by the police the next day. The Magistrate was entitled to believe the evidence of the complainant and the two police officers, as he did. We having ourselves perused the record of trial, the Magistrate could not but convict the appellant as charged. The appeal is ordered to be dismissed. Dated at Nairobi this 26th day of March, 1982. C.B. MADAN ................................

page 1 of 2

JUDGE OF APPEAL C.H.E. MILLER ................................ JUDGE OF APPEAL K.D. POTTER ................................ JUDGE OF APPEAL

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.