Search every case

…In Owners of Motor Vessel Lillian "S" vs Caltex Oil (K) Ltd (1789) K.L.R. 1, the court said…

…c. A declaration that the encroachment onto trespass upon expropriation of the plaintifi’s property known as L.R No…

…of N.R.B., N.R.B. H.C. No. 1024 of 2005 (O.S.), the court said a title…

…r. A Cabinet Secretary does not have the legal authority to re-designate stafi of state corporations. s. A public…

…employee of an afiliated company, Mr. R. V. Iyer, to the 1st Respondent’s Pate Road factory in March 2019…

…Din v Parkash Anand [1955] 22 E.A.C.A 48 and Maina v Mugiria1983 K.L.R 78. And…

…R.W.1 concluded that C.W.2 was given a fair hearing before his employment was terminated by a…

…Parties's Submissions: a. Applicant's Submissions: 8. The Applicant herein adopted and reiterated the grounds enumerated at the foot…

…a bearing on the client’s case.” 13. Similarly, in Justus Kariuki Mate & Another v Martin Nyaga Wambora & Another C…

…Only the caveat lodged on L.R. No. 2244/2 mentions that the caveat relates to a Plot ‘K’. That…

…R.W.5 said they received C.W.1’s results from KNEC but R.W.1 confirmed that C…

…R.K. Langat in MELC No. 16 of 2018 whose efiect was to dismiss the Plaintifi’s suit with costs…

…Rescission of a contract of sale of L.R. Ngong/Ngong/12800. b. Refund of Kshs. 150,000/- together with…

…N/A for 1st and 2nd Defendant. Caroline Nafuna – Court Assistant. E.K. WABWOTO JUDGE 6

…c) A declaration that the decision of the Subordinate Court in Kapsabet Principal Magistrate’s Court Civil Suit No. 137…

…of South African Vertnary Council v. Szymanski 2003 94] S.A. 42 [SCA], thus; “ [a] There must be an express…

…R.W.1 however was unable to produce the operations manual guiding a sale of respondent’s asset. R.W…

…1909); Louisville & N. R. Co. v Bartee, 204 Ala. 539 (Ala. 1920); Brite v Pfeil, 334 S.W.2d 596…

…A certificate of service Total claim = 656,467.6 C. Susan Wanjiku (16 Years) 5 (i) One month’s salary…

…Whether the Plainti’s suit as framed discloses a cause of action against the Defendant. C. Whether the Plainti’s…