Search every case

…High Court (Lenaola, J.) in the case of Samuel Momanyi - v- SDV Transami & Another (2012) eKLR) declared Section 45 (3…

…The High Court on 18th May 2012 granted 2 of the main prayers to the Petitioner, declaring:(a) Section 45…

…The Plaintifi had since instituted Mombasa High Court Civil Suit No.402 of (formerly Mombasa Chief Magistrate Civil Case No…

…abuse of the process of the Court in view of binding orders issued in CMCC No 451 of 2012, Thika…

…In the case of Samuel Momanyi -v- SDV Transami & Another (2012) eKLR, the High Court held that section 45(3…

…that it was 18th May 2012 that the High Court declared section 45(3) of the Act as constitutional. Still…

…High Court Petition 425 of 2012 and High Court judicial Review Application No. 339 of 2012 were consolidated. 2. The…

…The challenge may need to await the decision of higher Court. 34.Because of the conclusion reached, the Court wishes…

…The High Court ultimately granted a declaration that section 45(3) of the Act is invalid by reason of its…

…4581 pending the hearing and determination of BUNGOMA HIGH COURT ENVIRONMENT CASE No 11 of 2013. (b) Costs of the…

…The Court Finds: 7. Section 45[3] of the Employment Act was declared unconstitutional by the High Court, in Samuel…

…and determination of Nairobi High Court Civil Case Number 55 of 2012, formerly Civil Case Number 63 of 2009; Manchester…

…In the case of Law Society of Kenya v Commissioner of Lands and Others, Nakuru High Court, Civil Case No…

…from January 2012. He told the Court that days given to him as sick-offs and other offs were wrongly…

…45[3] by the Constitutional Division of the High Court in Samuel G. Momanyi v. the Attorney General & Another [2012…

…He told the court that the Defendants only paid Kshs. 2,760,000/= leaving a balance of Kshs. 1,453…

…2012. Determination 7. Article 165(5) (b) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 provides inter alia that the High Court…

…in Busia High Court JR No. 3 of 2012 and 1 Busia PM Land Case no. 45 of 2007 over…

…16 of 2012, this Court considered the rationale of the power of review that is vested in the courts and…

…not discharge its burden of proof under section 45 of the Act. Consequently, the court agrees with the Claimant that…