Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Small ClaimsPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2026] SCC 69 (KLR)

Carton Experts Ltd v Kenya Medical Research Institute (Civil Case E063 of 2026) [2026] SCC 69 (KLR)

Small Claims Court
11 May 2026
1,028 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan Small Claims Court set aside a default judgment because the defendant's defence raised real issues, but made it pay costs for missing deadlines.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Small Claims Court at Mombasa ruling determined a Notice of Motion dated 1st April 2026 by the Applicant seeking to set aside a default judgment and decree entered on 26th March 2026. The Applicant explained the default by the failure of its insurance agent to forward the pleadings to Gemina Insurance Company, and relied on a draft defence. The court, applying Rule 11(4) of the Small Claims Court Act Rules and the principles in James Kanyiita Nderitu v Ghikas, found the judgment was regular, since the Applicant had been served on 2nd March 2026, was aware of the proceedings, yet failed to attend court on 19th and 26th March 2026. The explanation of the insurance agent's failure was found untenable, the Applicant having slept on its rights. However, turning to the draft defence, the court found it raised triable issues - contributory negligence and a dispute over the manner in which the accident occurred - and, guided by Saicare Enterprises v Mana Pharmacy and Richard Murigu Wanyai v Attorney General, held that the court should not focus solely on the poverty of the excuse, and that denying a hearing should be the last resort. Finding no prejudice to the Claimant, the court set aside the default judgment and all consequential orders, deemed the Response dated 30th March 2026 properly filed, directed service of the defence within seven days, awarded throw-away costs of Kshs. 10,000/= to the Claimant, and fixed the file for mention on 13th May 2026 for directions.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the failure of an insurance agent to forward pleadings constitutes a sufficient excuse for default

Holding

No - the explanation was untenable because the defendant has an obligation to enter appearance and defend within prescribed timelines

Reasoning

The court found the Applicant aware of proceedings but absent on both the appearance and hearing dates. Service was effected on 2nd March 2026 and the Applicant was obliged to follow up to be properly on record; by failing to do so they slept on their rights. The judgment entered was therefore regular.

p. 2
02

Whether the draft defence raises triable issues

Holding

Yes - the defence pleads contributory negligence and disputes the manner in which the accident occurred

Reasoning

Notwithstanding the weak explanation, the draft defence raised contributory negligence and disputed the pleaded circumstances of the accident. Guided by Saicare Enterprises v Mana Pharmacy, the court held it should not focus solely on the poverty of the excuse but also on the nature of the action, the defence, compensability by costs, and that denying a hearing should be the last resort.

p. 2
03

Whether the Claimant would suffer prejudice if the judgment is set aside

Holding

No prejudice likely; the claim should be heard on merit

Reasoning

The court found that the Claimant could be protected by an award of throw-away costs and that no prejudice would flow from allowing the claim to be heard on its merits, which tipped the balance in favour of setting aside the regular default judgment on terms.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A regular default judgment may be set aside where the default was inadvertent, the application discloses a valid defence with probability of success, or there are sufficient grounds
  • Leave to defend after default judgment is not granted as a matter of course; the court must be satisfied a good explanation is offered
  • A triable defence may justify setting aside default judgment even where the excuse for default is weak; denying a hearing should be the last resort

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The default judgment entered on 26th March 2026 and all orders consequential thereto be and are hereby set aside
  2. 2.The Applicant/Respondent granted leave to defend the claim and the Response to Claim dated 30th March 2026 deemed properly filed and on record
  3. 3.The said defence to be served within seven days
  4. 4.The Applicant/Respondent to pay costs of Kshs. 10,000/=
  5. 5.File to be mentioned on 13th May 2026 before Hon. J.W. Mwangi for directions
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 11(4) of the Small Claims Court Act Rules (power to set aside default judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Carton Experts Ltd v Kenya Medical Research Institute (Civil Case E063 of 2026) [2026] SCC 69 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/scc/2026/69/eng@2026-05-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.