Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Small ClaimsAllowedStatement of claim dated 27th October 2024

Kazungu v Musyoki (Commercial Case E072 of 2025) [2026] SCC 12 (KLR)

Small Claims Court
28 January 2026
405 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a money claim for Kshs.171,500/= before the Voi Small Claims Court. The claimant averred that she entered into a verbal agreement with the respondent, advancing him Kshs.500,000/= to facilitate purchase of a motor vehicle, at the respondent's request deposited directly with Khushi Motors, repayable within a reasonable time. The respondent repaid Kshs.328,500/=, leaving the balance now claimed. The respondent denied the claim, asserting that the claimant was his girlfriend who in 2024 willingly gifted him a car registered in his name, and that when she demanded a refund he sold the vehicle for Kshs.200,000/= which she declined to acknowledge. Although he filed a response, the respondent did not attend the hearing despite service, and the matter proceeded in his absence. The court was satisfied from the certificate of service that the respondent was duly served. Finding evidence on record that the amount was deposited with Khushi Motors, and no evidence to the contrary, the court held that on a balance of probabilities the claimant had proved the claim. The respondent's defence was characterised as a mere denial unsupported by evidence. The claim was allowed in the sum of Kshs.171,500/= together with costs and interest at court rates, interest running from the date of filing until payment in full, and the file was closed. Judgment was delivered virtually at Voi on 28th January 2026 by F.M. Mulama, Adjudicator/RM.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the claimant proved on a balance of probabilities that the respondent owes her Kshs.171,500/= advanced for purchase of a motor vehicle
  2. 2.Whether the respondent's defence (that the money was a gift) was established

Key legal issues

#
01

Proof of the debt on a balance of probabilities

Holding

The claimant proved the claim against the respondent

Reasoning

The court noted the certificate of service showing due service, evidence that the amount was deposited with Khushi motors, and the absence of any evidence to the contrary from the respondent, who despite filing a response did not appear at the hearing. On a balance of probabilities the claim was proved.

p. 2
02

Weight of an unproven defence

Holding

The defence was a mere denial with no evidential backing

Reasoning

The respondent alleged the money was a gift from a girlfriend and that she later demanded a refund, but he did not appear at the hearing despite service and offered no evidence to support his allegations. An unsupported denial cannot defeat a claim proved on a balance of probabilities.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party who alleges a defence must adduce evidence to support it; a mere denial without evidence cannot displace a claim proved on a balance of probabilities

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claim contained in the statement of claim dated 27th October 2024 is allowed in the sum of Kshs.171,500/= together with costs and interest at court rates
  2. 2.Interest to be calculated from date of filing the claim until payment in full
  3. 3.The file be and is hereby closed

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

FM
F.M. MulamaAdjudicator
majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Small Claims Court jurisdiction over money claims (claim for Kshs.171,500)

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

The claim contained in the statement of claim dated 27th October 2024 is allowed in the sum of Kshs.171,500/= together with costs and interest at court rates.
p. 2Final orders - claim allowed
The interest to be calculated from date of filing the claim until payment in full.
p. 2Final orders - interest
on a balance of probabilities the claimant has proved the claim against the respondent.
p. 2Standard of proof

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kazungu v Musyoki (Commercial Case E072 of 2025) [2026] SCC 12 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Statement of claim dated 27th October 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/scc/2026/12/eng@2026-01-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.