Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Supreme CourtAllowedPresidential Election Petition E005 of 2022· [2022] KESC 46 (KLR)

Odinga & another v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 9 others

Supreme Court of Kenya
29 August 2022
1,105 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya LawDownload the judgment (PDF) Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Court allows ICJ Kenya to file legal arguments as a neutral friend in presidential election petition.

What this practically means

#

The Supreme Court of Kenya allowed the Kenyan Section of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ Kenya) to act as a neutral friend of the court in a presidential election petition. ICJ Kenya will submit written legal arguments on novel issues like election technology and the standard of proof. No party opposed. The court said ICJ Kenya cannot make oral arguments, and each side pays its own costs.

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by the Supreme Court of Kenya on an application by the Kenyan Section of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ Kenya) to be admitted as amicus curiae in a presidential election petition. The application was brought under rule 17A of the Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules 2017 and rule 19 of the Supreme Court Rules 2020. The applicant sought to assist the court on four novel legal issues: constitutional principles governing election technology, the standard of proof in election petitions and the court's powers over criminal allegations, appropriate reliefs in presidential election petitions, and the roles of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) and its Chairperson in result management. No party opposed the application. The court, guided by its earlier decision in Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v Mumo Matemu, which set out principles for amicus participation including neutrality, timeliness, and limitation to legal arguments, found the application merited. The court allowed the application, deemed the amicus brief as filed, but directed that the applicant shall not make oral submissions at the hearing. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs. The ruling reaffirms the court's approach to amicus curiae interventions, emphasizing that such interventions must be neutral, focused on novel legal points, and subject to court regulation to prevent partisanship.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether ICJ Kenya should be admitted as amicus curiae in a presidential election petition.

Holding

The application is merited and allowed, as the applicant has relevant expertise and will confine itself to legal arguments on novel issues.

Reasoning

The court considered the application under rule 17A of the Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules 2017 and rule 19 of the Supreme Court Rules 2020. It noted the guiding principles from Mumo Matemu, including that an amicus must be neutral, address novel legal points, and file timeously. No party opposed the application, and the applicant's intended arguments on election technology, standard of proof, appropriate reliefs, and roles of the Commission and Chairperson were deemed novel and within the scope of amicus intervention.

Legal principles established

#
  • An amicus curiae brief must be limited to legal arguments and filed on time.
  • An amicus curiae must remain neutral and faithful to the law.
  • The court can limit amicus participation to prevent partisanship.
  • An amicus curiae is not entitled to costs in litigation.
  • An amicus may address novel legal points not already covered by parties.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated August 27, 2022 and lodged on even date by Kenyan Section of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ Kenya) is allowed.
  2. 2.The amicus brief attached to the application is deemed as filed and the applicant shall not make oral submissions at the hearing of the petitions.
  3. 3.Parties shall bear their own costs.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 10
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 38
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 81
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 86
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 138(3)(a)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 138(3)(b)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 138(3)(c)
  • Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules 2017Rule 17A
  • Supreme Court Rules 2020Rule 19
  • Supreme Court Rules 2020Rule 19(1)
  • Elections Act, 2011Section 87
  • Election Offences Act, 2016

Cases cited (4)

  • Moses Masika Wetangula v Musikari Nazi Kombo & 2 others Petition 12 of 2014 [2015] eKLR
  • Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v Mumo Matemu & 5 others Sup Ct Petition No 12 of 2013 [2014] eKLR
  • Francis Karioki Muruatetu & another v Republic & 5 others Sup Ct Petition No 15 and 16 of 2015 [2016] eKLR
  • Raila Odinga & others v IEBC & others; SC Petition No 5 of 2013- Katiba Institute’s application to appear as amicus
Jurisdiction invoked
rule 17A of the Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules 2017, and rule 19 of the Supreme Court Rules 2020

Key timeline

#
2022-08-27
ICJ Kenya files application to be admitted as amicus curiae.
Ruling delivered (date not specified)
Supreme Court allows the application, deems amicus brief filed, but bars oral submissions.

Practical implications

#
For lawyers

Amicus curiae practice clarified

When applying to appear as amicus curiae in Kenyan election petitions, ensure your brief is strictly legal, neutral, and filed early. The court may deny oral submissions. Also note that costs are not recoverable. Use this ruling to structure future amicus applications.

For businesses

Election technology standards pending

Businesses involved in election technology should watch this case. The amicus will argue on constitutional principles governing technology use in elections. The court's eventual decision may set standards for vendors and service providers, affecting compliance and contracts.

For individuals

Understanding the amicus role

An amicus curiae is a neutral expert who helps the court on complex legal issues. In this case, ICJ Kenya will write on election technology and proof standards. Individuals can expect clearer rules on how election disputes are handled, but the amicus does not represent any party.

Frequently asked questions

#
What is an amicus curiae in Kenya?+

An amicus curiae, or 'friend of the court', is a neutral person or organization that provides legal expertise on issues not fully argued by the parties. In Kenya, the Supreme Court allows amicus briefs under specific rules, requiring neutrality and timeliness.

Can an amicus curiae make oral submissions in Kenya?+

Not automatically. In this case, the Supreme Court allowed ICJ Kenya to file written arguments but barred oral submissions. The court has discretion to limit amicus participation to prevent partisanship or delay.

What are the rules for amicus curiae in Kenyan Supreme Court?+

Under Supreme Court Rules 2020 and Presidential Election Petition Rules 2017, an amicus must be neutral, file a brief limited to legal arguments, address novel points, and apply timeously. The court may regulate participation and does not award costs to amici.

What was the ICJ Kenya case about in Kenya?+

ICJ Kenya applied to be amicus curiae in a presidential election petition to argue on four novel legal issues: election technology, standard of proof, appropriate reliefs, and roles of IEBC and its chairperson. The Supreme Court allowed the application.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Odinga & another v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 9 others", Case Analysis (2022). Presidential Election Petition E005 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.orghttps://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kesc/2022/46/eng@2022-08-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.