Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Supreme CourtAllowedPetition (Application) 21 (E023) of 2020

Member of Parliament for Mbalambala Constituency v Abdi & 7 others

Supreme Court of Kenya
4 November 2022
283 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya LawDownload the judgment (PDF) Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Court allows lawyer to withdraw because client stopped communicating and giving instructions.

What this practically means

#

A law firm asked the Supreme Court for permission to stop representing a client who had stopped contacting them and failed to give instructions despite reminders. The court agreed, stating that a client must properly instruct their lawyer and that the court should not force a lawyer to appear for a client who has lost touch. The client was ordered to pay the costs of the application.

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by a single judge of the Supreme Court of Kenya (Justice I. Lenaola) on a Notice of Motion dated 31st January 2022. The motion was brought by M/S Issa & Co Advocates, counsel for the 6th respondent in a pending petition, seeking leave to cease acting for the 6th respondent. The grounds were that the 6th respondent had ceased contact with the firm and, despite several reminders, failed to give proper instructions, making it impossible for counsel to proceed with the hearing scheduled for 10th November 2022. The motion was served on all parties, including the 6th respondent, but none responded. The court opined that a party must properly and fully instruct counsel to receive the best legal advice, and failure to do so would stall the matter and not serve the interests of justice. The court also stated that it should not force counsel to appear for a party that has lost touch. Consequently, the court allowed the motion, granted leave to M/S Issa & Co Advocates to cease acting for the 6th respondent, and ordered the 6th respondent to pay the costs of the motion.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether counsel should be granted leave to cease acting for the 6th respondent who has ceased contact and failed to give proper instructions

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether counsel can be granted leave to cease acting when the client has ceased contact and failed to give instructions.

Holding

Yes, the court granted leave to cease acting because the client had ceased contact and failed to give proper instructions, and the court should not force counsel to appear under such circumstances.

Reasoning

The court considered that the 6th respondent had ceased contact and failed to give proper instructions despite several reminders, making it impossible for counsel to proceed with the hearing. The court opined that a party must properly instruct counsel for the best legal advice, and failure to do so would stall the matter and not serve the interests of justice. The court also noted that it should not force counsel to appear for a party that has lost touch.

Legal principles established

#
  • A court should not force a lawyer to represent a client who has lost contact.
  • A client must properly and fully instruct their lawyer to receive effective legal representation.
  • Failure to give instructions can stall a case and is not in the interests of justice.
  • A lawyer may be granted leave to cease acting if the client fails to communicate despite reminders.
  • Costs can be awarded against a client who fails to cooperate with their lawyer.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 31st January 2022 be and is hereby allowed and M/S Issa & Co Advocates, are hereby granted leave to cease acting for the 6th Respondent.
  2. 2.The 6th Respondent shall pay the costs thereof.

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

Isaac Lenaola
I. LenaolaSCJ
Currently serving
majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Rules 18(6) and (7) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2020

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

A court should also not force Counsel to appear for a party that has lost touch for whatever reason.
p. 2 Counsel's duty and court's discretion on ceasing to act
The Notice of Motion dated 31st January 2022 be and is hereby allowed and M/S Issa & Co Advocates, are hereby granted leave to cease acting for the 6th Respondent.
p. 2 Final orders
The 6th Respondent shall pay the costs thereof.
p. 2 Costs order

Key timeline

#
2022-01-31
Notice of Motion filed seeking leave to cease acting
2022-11-10
Ruling delivered allowing the motion and granting leave to cease acting

Practical implications

#
For lawyers

Withdrawing from unresponsive clients

When a client ceases contact and fails to give instructions, you can apply to court for leave to cease acting. Document all attempts to communicate. The court will grant the order if it finds the client has lost touch, and may award costs against the client. This ruling confirms the court's reluctance to force counsel to appear under such circumstances.

For businesses

Maintain communication with your lawyer

If you are a party in litigation, you must stay in touch with your lawyer and provide instructions. Failure to do so can lead to your lawyer withdrawing, which may delay your case and result in a costs order against you. Ensure you have a clear communication channel with your legal team.

For individuals

Stay in touch with your lawyer

If you hire a lawyer, you must respond to their requests for instructions. If you stop communicating, your lawyer can ask the court to stop representing you. The court will likely allow it, and you may have to pay the costs of the application. Keep your lawyer informed to avoid this.

Frequently asked questions

#
Can a lawyer withdraw from a case in Kenya if the client stops communicating?+

Yes, a lawyer can apply to court for leave to cease acting if the client stops communicating and fails to give instructions. The court will grant the order if it finds the client has lost touch, as seen in this Supreme Court ruling.

What happens if I don't give instructions to my lawyer in Kenya?+

If you fail to give instructions despite reminders, your lawyer may apply to court to stop representing you. The court may allow the withdrawal and order you to pay costs. This can delay your case and harm your interests.

Can a court force a lawyer to represent a client who has lost contact in Kenya?+

No, the court should not force a lawyer to appear for a client who has lost touch. The court will grant leave to cease acting if the client fails to communicate and give instructions, as established in this case.

What are the costs if my lawyer withdraws in Kenya due to lack of instructions?+

If your lawyer withdraws because you failed to give instructions, the court may order you to pay the costs of the withdrawal application. This is to compensate the lawyer for the time and effort spent.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Member of Parliament for Mbalambala Constituency v Abdi & 7 others", Case Analysis (2022). Petition (Application) 21 (E023) of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.orghttps://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kesc/2022/73/eng@2022-11-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.